Real Exam Research

Does PTE's Human Scoring Make It Harder Than IELTS? I Tested Both

Since PTE introduced a human-scoring component to its evaluation, some students have been considering switching to IELTS, assuming it would be the easier option. So I sat both exams and compared the results directly.

Quick Answer

Based on a direct comparison, no — human scoring doesn't appear to have made PTE harder than IELTS. On the IELTS Writing task, using genuine, unassisted English with no templates or strategies, the result was a 6.5. On PTE Writing, using a tested structure and technique, the result was 90 — the maximum score, often cited as roughly equivalent to a 9 on the IELTS scale. That gap suggests technique and preparation still matter more than which exam has human involvement in scoring.

Anyone considering switching from PTE to IELTS because PTE now involves human scoring deserves an honest, informed answer — not just a guess based on forum comments. So rather than speculating, I sat the IELTS Writing task myself, then compared it directly against a tested PTE Writing attempt.

The Comparison I Ran

For IELTS Writing, I answered the prompt using my own natural level of English — no templates, no exam-specific strategies, just a genuine, best-effort response. I used to teach IELTS years ago, so this wasn't an unfamiliar format, but I deliberately avoided leaning on any technique. The goal was to see what an honest, unassisted attempt would score.

For PTE Writing, I tested a structured, technique-based approach — the same kind of approach we test and teach — rather than an unassisted attempt.

IELTS Test Report Form showing Listening 9.0, Reading 6.5, Writing 6.5, Speaking 9.0, Overall Band 8.0

Full IELTS Test Report Form. Personal details redacted.

Worth noting on the Reading score specifically: during the Reading section of this exam, a fire alarm triggered a drill, and the entire test centre had to evacuate. After roughly 40 minutes waiting outside, everyone had to go through the full check-in process again before resuming. As a result, the remaining Reading questions were guessed rather than genuinely attempted. The 6.5 Reading score reflects that disruption, not a fair test of Reading difficulty — it should not be read as evidence that IELTS Reading is harder than PTE Reading. This comparison is specifically about Writing, where no such disruption occurred.
IELTS Writing
6.5

Genuine, unassisted attempt — no templates or strategy

PTE Writing
90

Structured, technique-based approach — the maximum score

A 90 on PTE Writing is often cited as roughly equivalent to a 9 on the IELTS band scale — the highest band possible. The unassisted IELTS attempt landed at 6.5, several bands below that.

This is a comparison between two different approaches as much as it's a comparison between two exams: an honest attempt with no strategy on one side, and a tested technique on the other. That gap says as much about the value of preparation as it does about which exam is "harder."

What This Suggests About Human Scoring

If PTE's human-scoring component had fundamentally made the exam harder to score well on, a technique tested specifically for the current system shouldn't have been able to reach the maximum score. It did. That doesn't prove human scoring has no effect at all, but it does suggest the idea that "PTE is now harder than IELTS because of human scoring" isn't well supported by this comparison — preparation and technique still appear to matter more than which exam has a human involved in scoring.

The Real Question to Ask Before Switching

Before switching exams based on the assumption that one is now easier than the other, it's worth asking: is the current exam actually harder, or is the preparation approach not suited to how it's scored now? Based on this comparison, an untrained, technique-free attempt scored respectably on IELTS but well below the maximum — and a trained, technique-tested approach reached the maximum on PTE. That points toward preparation quality as the bigger factor, not the exam itself.

This is one direct, controlled comparison — the same person, tested deliberately on both exams — not a claim that applies universally to every test-taker. It's a useful data point for making an informed decision, not a guarantee of any individual result.

For more on why a single score claim shouldn't be taken as universal proof, see 3 things most students get wrong about PTE scoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did PTE's human scoring make the exam harder?

Based on a direct comparison test, not necessarily. A technique-based approach to PTE Writing reached the maximum score of 90, suggesting that preparation and technique still matter more than the introduction of human scoring.

Is IELTS easier than PTE now?

Not based on this comparison. An honest, unassisted attempt at IELTS Writing scored 6.5, while a tested, technique-based approach to PTE Writing scored the maximum. The difference suggests preparation quality plays a larger role than which exam is chosen.

What score on PTE is equivalent to an IELTS 9?

A 90 on PTE — the highest score displayed on a score report — is often cited as roughly equivalent to a 9 on the IELTS band scale, the highest possible IELTS band.

Should I switch from PTE to IELTS because of human scoring?

That depends on your own circumstances, but this comparison suggests the assumption that PTE became harder due to human scoring isn't strongly supported. Before switching, it's worth evaluating whether the real issue is the exam itself or whether the current preparation approach is suited to how the exam is scored now.

Does the 6.5 IELTS Reading score mean IELTS Reading is harder than PTE Reading?

No. During this particular attempt, a fire alarm triggered a full evacuation during the Reading section, and after roughly 40 minutes waiting outside and redoing check-in, the remaining questions were guessed rather than genuinely attempted. That Reading score reflects the disruption, not a fair comparison of Reading difficulty between the two exams.

Prepare With Techniques Tested on the Real Exam

Every technique taught in our program is verified against real PTE exam results under the current scoring system.

Join the Program
Sonny Chang
Written by

Sonny Chang

Founder of Sonny English | Adapted Coaching, a Sydney-based PTE Academic coaching business with 10+ years of PTE-specific coaching experience. Sonny personally sits the real PTE exam regularly to verify every technique before teaching it. Read more about Sonny →

Discover more from Sonny English

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading